The Average

September 15, 2024

by Stephen Stofka

This week’s letter is about two different investing styles, active and passive, and how they are affected by the average. The active vs passive debate in investing began several decades ago when John Bogle founded Vanguard as a way for individual investors to invest in a market basket of stocks. The active investor is like a miner panning for gold in a mountain stream. He (mostly male, I think) carefully studies the residue in the bottom of the pan, looking for the glint of gold in the sunlight. Some miners strike it rich while most barely cover the costs of their tools and time. The index investor, on the other hand, buys a share of the company that buys gold from the individual miners.

The core issue in that debate stretches back to the classical period in ancient Greece and the role of our powers of reason. In the following sections, I will rely on some points my wife, Dr. Beth Davies, made to her class this week. For some background, Aristotle was a Greek philosopher who lived and wrote in the 4th century B.C. Thomas Aquinas was a 13th century Christian theologian who tried to unite the secular reasoning of Aristotle with the Catholic tenets of faith.

Davies writes “Aristotle places all of his confidence in our faculty of reason. No matter the shifts that our fortunes face in life, we can always apply practical reason and therefore pursue our desired end, which is to flourish (be happy).” The active investor believes that research and reasoning can generate what is known as alpha, the extra return that an investing strategy has over an average that serves as a benchmark.

Davies writes “Aquinas loved Aristotle’s philosophy … but the worldview of his time was saturated with the belief that human nature is inherently sinful,” implying that our sinful desires interfere with our reasoning process. How did Aquinas resolve this dilemma? Davies continues, “He did it by adapting the Islamic idea that human intellect is a natural process. Since God created nature, natural processes are not corrupted by sin. Medieval theologians grouped intellect into this category of ‘natural process.’ Medieval theologians, Christian and Islamic, needed a way to preserve some part of the mind from sin, and since reason can be corrupted by appetite, they settled on intellect.” Having less confidence in their intellectual expertise at investing, the passive investor accepts an average market return and saves both the expense of higher trading fees and their own time.

In Thinking Fast and Slow, Daniel Kahneman noted the many cognitive biases that introduce flaws in our reasoning when we make choices. In recognition of these biases, investment managers have developed algorithmic trading models intended to reduce human error and bias. The execution of those strategies can be tainted by faulty reasoning as well, so investment managers are turning toward machine learning. Criteria like minimum returns and acceptable risk ratios are input into programs which run thousands of simulations on trading data and research to find optimal trading strategies (Hansen, 2020). In a medieval interpretation, these programs are the embodiment of the distinction between intellect, created by God, and corruptible human reasoning.

Most individual investors do not have the time, resources or background to develop or maintain such strategies. In the future, investment managers may offer funds or ETFs that employ such strategies but will charge higher fees for the promise of higher risk-adjusted returns. In an analysis of eight years of market data from 2009 -2017, Prondzinski and Miller (2018) wrote “evidence suggests that active funds underperform index funds by approximately the difference in their costs.” If these strategies do deliver higher returns, more investment firms will use them, raising the average market return and reducing alpha to near zero. Even if short-term returns are higher, a passive strategy should produce returns at least as good as many active strategies.

Indexes rely on the power of the mean. There are several ways to compute an average, or mean, but the most common is the arithmetic mean, determined by the sum of the data divided by the number of data points. Few if any data points match the average, yet it is a benchmark concept in statistics, forming the basis for many calculations like variance and standard deviations. Index funds rely on the Law of Large Numbers, creating a sample of a large dataset filtered by some criteria like market capitalization. Unlike machine learning, the filter criteria is not a dynamic optimizing strategy but a characteristic of the market. It is less dynamic but a “good enough” strategy that minimizes costs.

To Aristotle, the virtuous mean was a behavioral phenomenon where an individual used their reason to compromise between extremes of action. On a highway, some drivers are weavers, changing lanes frequently in the belief that an optimizing strategy will get them to their destination sooner. Some drivers keep to one lane, going with the flow and making few changes until they approach their exit. At the exit, they experience a sense of satisfaction upon finding that they are only a few cars behind a weaver. That is index investing.

//////////////////

Photo by StellrWeb on Unsplash

Keywords: passive investing, active investing, alpha

Hansen, K. B. (2020). The virtue of simplicity: On machine learning models in algorithmic trading. Big Data & Society, 7(1), 205395172092655. doi:10.1177/2053951720926558. Available from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/2053951720926558

Prondzinski, D., & Miller, M. (2018). Active Versus Passive Investing: Evidence From The 2009-2017 Market. Journal of Accounting and Finance18(8). https://doi.org/10.33423/jaf.v18i8.114

Investment Fees

Let’s put aside our rosy glasses, put on our fine print glasses and look at some percentages regarding investment fees.

I will compare two bond funds holding the same type of bonds. Fund A, an index fund, charges .5% while Fund B, an actively managed fund, charges 1.5% in management and other expenses. The manager or salesperson for Fund B may tell a prospective client that the returns for their fund are superior and will make up for the 1% difference in fees. Many brokers are of the Lake Wobegon mentality, believing that the products they sell are above average.

1% sounds like a small amount so this might seem reasonable to you if you are wearing your rosy glasses. But let’s look at some hard data. Let’s say that the index Fund A averages a 5% return before expenses. The more actively managed fund B would have to earn 6% before fees just to break even with the return on Fund A. Again, that 1% sounds small but what it means is that Fund B has to make a return that is 20% greater than the index. Very few funds are able to do that.

Let’s look at those fees again as a percentage of the return, not the total dollars invested. On a 5% return, index Fund A’s fee of .5% is 10% of the return. Even if Fund B can generate a 6% return, it’s 1.5% fee is a fat 25% of the return, more than what many hedge funds charge.

Let’s say that Fund B has generated these higher returns in the past. How does it do that? Often, by taking more risk than the index fund A. You can check an assessment of a fund’s return vs. risk at any number of stock research sites. Yahoo’s finance site has some good assessment tools. Enter the fund’s symbol and in the resulting summary page, click on “Risk” in the left column. You will be taken to a page which shows 3 year, 5 year and 10 year risk and return ratios.

Alpha measures the amount of return for the degree of risk involved. The average is 0. Less than 0 means that the fund does not get a return commensurate with the risks it takes. More than 0 means that the fund gets a better than average return for the risks it takes. You will be able to compare the fund with other funds in its category.

There are so many index funds and low cost index ETFs in the market for an investor to choose from. If you are willing to take more risk in bonds, for example, you can probably find an index product that invests in a riskier class of bonds. Over the long run, expense fees do matter. The lower the return, the more they matter. Over 10 years, that additional 1% in fees will cost you $1400 on a $10,000 investment in a fund averaging a 5% return.

In short, play the percentages.