January 31, 2016
In the closing moments of one of the “big ape” films, the very large gorilla Mighty Joe Young saves the girl, placing her on a boat as an island in the Pacific, broken by a volcano, falls back into the sea. The bandaged hand of the big ape reaching out of the roiling waters is the last we see of the movie’s star.
On Friday morning, the Bank of Japan (BOJ) surprised the world by cutting it’s funds rate to a negative .1% from a positive .1%, vowing to fight the deflation and lack of growth that has plagued the Japanese economy for two decades. As the island’s economy collapses under the weight of its aging population and lack of immigration, the bank thrust its arm above the Pacific waters to save – well, the entire Japanese population. Could be the script of another big ape movie or a Godzilla sequel.
The first estimate of fourth quarter GDP was released Friday morning and the news was not good, which meant that the news was good, get it?! GDP growth for the last quarter was positive, not negative, but less than 1%, so traders figured that the Fed will not raise interest rates again in March.
#3 in the combination was positive earnings surprises from Microsoft and Facebook, among others. Thursday was the busiest day of the earnings season. #4 The price of oil continued to climb above the near rock-bottom benchmark of $30. All of these factors were the impetus for a stock market surge of 2-1/2% on Friday and helped soften a really bad start to the year. For the month, the index fell 5%. During the month, revisions to earnings estimates for 2016 fell about the same amount – 4.7% (Fact Set). In short, the stock market re-priced itself.
As the primary season approaches and millions of Americans receive their W-2 earnings record in the mail, Americans turn their attention to the cheery subjects of incomes and income taxes. Here’s a Heritage Foundation chart of the effective payroll tax rates and income tax rates for the five quintiles of Americans based on income.
Those in the lowest quintile making less than $25K pay a combined rate of 2.1%. Those in the next quintile making less than about $47K pay a combined rate of 6.6%. Those in the next higher quintile making less than $80K pay 12.2%. The top two quintiles pay 14.7% and 21% respectively. It is easy to understand why many in the upper quintiles feel that they are already paying their fair share of taxes.
The fault in these calculations is that they neglect the employer’s portion of the payroll tax which is paid indirectly by the employee in the form of a lower wage. Including that portion would add another 7.5% to 8% to the lower quintiles, a bit less to the top two quintiles. Here’s a chart showing the total payroll tax burden since the Social Security Act was passed in the 1930s.
Should the rich pay more in taxes? Yes, says Democratic Presidential contender Bernie Sanders. Many Americans do not realize that we are in the top 10% of global incomes, the world’s fat cats. Should Americans pay a global fairness tax of 10% or so? This money would then be redistributed to poorer people around the world. That is the world that Mr. Sanders is aiming toward.
Consumer Problem Survey
Over the past several thousand years people have developed numerous tools to predict the future. Reading chicken bones, tea leaves and other forms of augery have given way to mathematical and statistical modeling. The folks at Georgetown have developed a predictive tool to estimate consumer spending. Using a survey methodology researchers ask consumers what problems they have and which ones they are planning to solve in the coming months. These can be the payment of taxes, needing a new computer, iPad, or cell phone, the purchase of new home, etc. Based on these responses, the researchers compile a Problem Driven Conumption Index (PDCI). In the spring and early winter of 2014, the predictive index badly under-estimated retail sales.
However, the approach brings an essential understanding of the challenges American families face. In a 2013 survey, respondents reported having many problems for which they see no solutions. We learn that men and women have a few problems in common but confirm the axiom that each sex really does see the world differently. The researchers are able to chart the shifting patterns of problems as we age. This problems based approach is another statistical tool in the field of behavioral finance.