Earnings 2011

Over 80% of S&P500 companies have reported earnings for the 3rd quarter.  80% have beat earnings estimates that were previously lowered, an indication of how well companies are managing the estimates of the analysts who cover them.  In the third quarter of 2009, how many companies beat estimates?  79% (source) – pretty close to this year’s third quarter.

In September of this year, Standard and Poors reported that 2011 earnings estimates for the S&P500 fell below $100 after peaking at about $105 in early August.  2012 earnings estimates have been lowered from $111 to $108.  The S&P index closed about $1250 this past Friday, giving a forward P/E ratio of almost 12, a fairly conservative ratio.  These estimates, however, do not take into account any debt contagion from Europe. In a recent interview Nick Raich, Director of Research at Key Private Bank, projected an estimate of $85 in 2012 if there are no solutions found to the debt crisis in Europe.

Investors Friend has an article summarizing past S&P500 earnings and the difficulty of estimating earnings as there are several versions of earnings – GAAP and operating being two of the most frequently cited.

Yesterday Standard and Poors issued an update of third quarter earnings results.  Pay particular attention to the downward revisions for next year’s earnings in each sector.

The Gap And The GAAP

GAAP – it’s not the clothing store but an acronym for Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, or guidelines for companies to follow when figuring up their financials, including their earnings. It is those earnings that are usually the basis for how much a company’s stock sells for. Public companies report their earnings to the government each quarter according to GAAP principles, and are called net earnings. From these earnings companies pay out dividends to their shareholders.

There is another common form of earnings, called operating earnings, which are higher than net earnings. Naturally, company officers refer to those higher earnings in conference calls to investors each quarter. Operating earnings do give a better sense of the long term viability and profitably of a company. What’s the difference?

Operating earnings are what’s left after paying employees, material costs and operating expenses, lease or loan payments and depreciation on buildings and equipment and so on. There are two costs that it doesn’t account for: taxes and interest. Net earnings are lower because that’s what left after paying taxes and interest. Net earnings will also include adjustments for what are called extraordinary items: one-time expenses that should not be recurring.

In a 9/18/09 “Ahead of the Tape” WSJ column, Mark Gongloff reports that the gap has narrowed between these two measures, operating and net earnings. The gap was about 2% and that narrow gap signals stability – for now. Mark notes that the last time the gap was this narrow was in the quarter ending March 2000. What he doesn’t mention is that, shortly after that date, the stock market started a long swan dive. Over the past 15 years, the cumulative gap between these two earning figures has been increasing each quarter. From past experience, we know that the gap widens during a recession. I suspect that this long term trend shows that there have too many aggressive accounting tactics so that management could paint a rosier picture of a company’s future earning potential, thus driving up the price of the stock.

Lastly, these two measures play an important part in evaluating the price of a stock. The P/E ratio, a common yardstick to measure stock price, is the price of a stock divided by the earnings per share. There are two common P/E ratios: TTM, or stock price divided by earnings during the trailing, or past, twelve months; and forward P/E, which is the stock price divided by the estimated earnings for the next twelve months. However, the two P/E ratios are based on two different earnings. The TTM ratio is based on net earnings. Forward P/E is based on estimates of operating, not net, earnings. Even if estimates prove to be accurate (which is unlikely a year in advance), the net earnings will be lower when they actually happen. If a 2% gap in these two measures is unusual, then a cautious investor might add another 4% to a estimate of future P/E to get a more realistic estimate.